Some Facts / Speculations/ Doubts arising out of the Bandaranaike Assassination
Some Facts / Speculations/ Doubts arising out of
the Bandaranaike Assassination
I was among a group of teachers from SAC who stood in a queue for over six
hours, in sun & rain, to pay our respects to the late Prime Minister, S. W.
R. D. Bandaranaike, when the remains were lying in state at Horagolla in
September, 1959. The mood in the country was one of extreme sadness. Many in
the queue around us strongly desired that the perpetrators should receive the
maximum punishment.
Death Penalty
At the time of the assassination the death
penalty was suspended on the initiative of PM Bandaranaike himself (JRJ
did the same later) . A Commission of Inquiry on Capital Punishment was thereafter appointed
in 1958 with Australian Professor of Law , Norwal Morris as Chairman &
Professor T. Nadarajah & Sir Edwin Wijeyaratne as members. In 1959 just
before the assassination, Sessional paper XIV of 1959 was published
wherein the majority view was that the suspension of the death penalty should
remain.
New Prime Minister
On the death of Mr. Bandaranaike, it was W. Dahanayake , a former teacher at SAC from 1928 to 1936 , & Acting Leader of the House who was appointed the PM by the Governor General. His tenure in office was of short duration, but within a week of his appointment, a gazette notification was issued & thereafter Parliamentary approval was obtained for the Suspension of Capital Punishment (Repeal) Act 1959 to implement the death penalty with retrospective effect. Under normal circumstances. W. Dahanayake MP would have been the first to raise his voice in protest against retrospective legislation, but in the atmosphere that prevailed then, there was no serious disagreement with this move.Perpetrators
It was generally accepted that the Ven. Talduwa Somarama Thera was the assassin.Facts of the Case
A distinguished Aloysian from 1921 to 1931 & a Judge of the Supreme Court, Justice A. C. Alles, during his retirement, wrote a series of books on Famous Criminal Cases of Sri Lanka , including the Bandaranaike case & details of the case are available therein. Justice Alles, when he was Solicitor General, also appeared for the state at the Bandaranaike Assassination Commission of Inquiry appointed in 1963 to inquire into certain matters pertaining to the case. Justice Alles passed away in 2003 & Appreciations about him, including one from Anura Bandaranaike, can be read here: http://www.worldgenweb.org/lkawgw/acalles.html.
L. G. Weeramantry, who
defended the monk , Somarama also wrote a book titled “Assassination of a Prime
Minister” & it was published in Geneva in 1969. ISBN: 169641.
Details of the case can
also be accessed from the following links:
D. B. S. Jeyaraj –
https://www.dailymirror.lk/opinion/Aftermath-Of-Bandaranaikes-Assassination-INVESTIGATION-TO-INDICTMENT/172-175319
https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=33515
Sachi Sri Kantha -
Part 1 Politics https://tamilnation..org/forum/sachisrikantha/091010banda
Part 2 Forensics https://tamilnation.org/forum/sachisrikantha/091003banda
Part 3 Theatrics & Economics https://tamilnation.org/forum/sachisrikantha/091010banda
Chandani Kirinda -
https://www.ft.lk/front-page/Assassination-of-a-Prime-Minister-Revisiting-the-Bandaranaike-murder-case-62-years-later/44-723437
At the Supreme Court trial, three of the accused, monk Mapitigama Buddharakkhita, H. P. Jayawardena & monk Talduwa Somarama were found guilty by the Jury. Addressing the accused the judge seemed to express the view that he agreed with the finding of the jury. When asked whether they had anything to say before sentence of death was passed, Buddharakkhita said that far from being the architect of a conspiracy he was the victim of one , Jayawardena denied any involvement in the conspiracy & Somarama denied shooting the Prime Minister. Sentence of death was passed on them.
At the Court of Criminal Appeal, it was noted that Parliament had not included "conspiracy to murder" as an offence warranting the death penalty in the newly enacted legislation & the first two accused, Mapitigama Buddharakkhita & H. P. Jayawardena had their death sentences commuted to life imprisonment.( NLR 63/433 Queen vs Mapitigama Buddharakkhita & 2 others, https://www.lawlanka.com/lal/nlrDetailView?nlrSelectedVolume=63).
Leave to appeal to the Privy Council was refused.
Talduwa Somarama was executed on 6 July, 1962 at Welikade Prison.
Mapitigama Buddharakkhita was assigned to work in the Prison Library & H. P. Jayawardena, in the Printing Section at Welikade Prison.
In 1966, the terms of life imprisonment imposed on Buddharakkhita & Jayawardena were commuted to terms of 20 years imprisonment.
Prisoner Buddharakkhita died of a
heart ailment at the General Hospital, Colombo in early 1967, while still
serving the prison sentence. Prisoner H. P.
Jayawardena, the other accused was released in 1977 on completion of his prison
sentence.
Speculations
Finding of an extra monk's robe at the scene of the crime
There was some speculation on whether another person in robes was the assassin as there was a witness who stated that she saw someone jumping over the wall saying “hari machang’ & an extra robe was found at the scene of the crime. This gave rise to the possibility that in addition to the monk, Somarama, there was at least one other person at the scene of the crime.
Conversion
of Somarama to Christianity
A few days before the
execution of Talduwa Somarama he was baptised as Peter, & it was Peter who
was executed. Death row prisoners were normally allowed to see a priest of
their own religious denomination, & the question arose as to how he came to
be baptised. It transpired that Rev. Fr. Mathew Peiris, who was the Christian
Prison Chaplain had been given access to the prisoner at the latter's request.
It was speculated that the Governor General, fearing a backlash if a bhikkhu
was executed, prevailed upon Fr. Peiris, whom he knew well, to convert Somarama
to Christianity, & that Fr. Peiris did so by promising to obtain a pardon
for him. This was only speculation at the time & may or may not have been
true. (Fr. Peiris himself served a term of imprisonment much later).
Book about
the Assassination alleged to have been written by Buddharakkhita
No sooner the death of
Buddharakkhita was announced in 1967, there was a strong rumour within &
outside the Welikade Prison that he had written a book about the assassination.
The government of the day & the
press were keen to get hold of it. The Superintendent of the Prison, W. J.
de Silva immediately directed one of his trusted Jailors, K.
Tharmarajah, National Hockey player and the Office Jailor, (who happened to be me), to search for the book in the prisoner's cell, but nothing was found. Among the senior staff were national cricketers, W. A. N. de Silva,
Norton Frederick, Stanley de Alwis, etc., all of whom were held in high esteem by the prison population.
They received confirmation that Buddharakkhita was often seen writing in his
cell at night. The two
Jailors were then locked up for the night in the prison library, where the
prisoner used to work before entering hospital, & instructed to search
within the covers of every book there. Around 2.00 am on the following day, a
monitor's exercise book written by the prisoner was found & taken charge of
by the Superintendent. The search continued till morning but nothing else was
found.
It later transpired that the material contained in the book was already
known to the general public at the time of the investigation & trial:
- the formation of the Eksath Bhikkhu Peramuna, & how it contributed to the victory of the Prime Minister
- the formation of the Colombo Shipping Lines by some of his associates, which included his brother, to undertake government contracts etc
- the inability to move forward with their plans due to the reluctance of the Prime Minister to approve any contracts.
Had he been able to write the next episode of this narrative, he might
have shed more light about the conspiracy to assassinate the Prime
Minister. However, what he had written in the exercise book did indicate
that he had more than a passing interest in the shipping company & that he
& the others associated with him were disappointed with the Prime Minister
over the latter’s reluctance to approve contracts sought by the company. The book
was handed over to the Minister of Justice.
Doubts about the Perpetrators / Findings
At the time of the assassination & thereafter there were many theories about the perpetrators involved in the crime. One of them was made a crown witness, while others were discharged at various stages. A few others, including W. Dahanayake, were summoned before a Commission of Inquiry but the only adverse finding was made against Mrs. Vimala Wijewardena. Sessional Paper III of 1964 contains the details. Some raised questions on whether the evidence lead by the prosecution proved the charges against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt and these are referred to by Sanjiva Senanayake in the following articles :
https://island.lk/beyond-reasonable-doubt/ 17.10.2021
https://island.lk/beyond-reasonable-doubt-r/ 24.10.2021
https://island.lk/beyond-reasonable-doubt-2/ 31.10.2021
https://island.lk/beyond-reasonable-doubt-3/ 7.11.2021
K. K. de Silva





Comments
Post a Comment